parents' Article 8 rights do not . Hum Vaccin Immunother. 43R@ ~? The Gillick competence doctrine is part of Australian case law (see, e.g., DoCS v Y [1999] NSWSC 644). 947 What is the Age of Legal Capacity (Scotland) Act 1991? Call us on 0116 234 7246 It is a very important concept in the area of consent to surgical treatment - if a doctor doesn't have a valid consent from either a parent or the child, or . You can also download or order Childline posters and wallet cards. If a child passes the Gillick test, he or she is considered Gillick competent to consent to that medical treatment or intervention. The standard is based on a decision of the Lady Justice Purvis in the case Gillick v West Norfolk and . For safeguarding training, resources and consultancy A relatively young child would have sufficient maturity and intelligence to be competent to consent to a plaster on a small cut. The rule in Gillick must be applied when determining whether a child under 16 has competence to consent. If a person aged 16 or 17 years or a Gillick-competent child refuses treatment that refusal Decision making competence does not simply arrive with puberty; it depends on the maturity and intelligence of the child and the seriousness of the treatment decision to be made. Let's make care better together. [Accessed 02/02/2020]. >> The United Nations Convention on Children's Rights (UNCRC; 1989) defines a child as any person under 18; however, by convention British courts refer to all persons under 18 as minors, those under 16 as children and 16 and 17 y olds as young persons.Citation2 The UNCRC requires that childhood is recognized as a developmental period and that our domestic laws must be developed in a manner consistent with the evolving capacities of the child (United Nations 1989, Article 5).Citation2 As children grow and develop in maturity, their views and wishes must be given greater weight and their development toward adulthood must be respected and promoted. Mental Health Matters, What is Marions Case (1982)? It is considered good practice for doctors and other health professionals to follow the criteria outlined by Lord Fraser in 1985 in the House of Lords' ruling in the case of Victoria Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Health Authority and Department of Health and Social Security. Fraser guidelines originally just related to contraceptive advice and treatment but, following a case in 2006, they now apply to decisions about treatment for sexually transmitted infections and termination of pregnancy. The young person will understand the professionals advice; The young person cannot be persuaded to inform their parents; The young person is likely to begin, or to continue having, sexual intercourse with or without contraceptive treatment; Unless the young person receives contraceptive treatment, their physical or mental health, or both, are likely to suffer; and. A persistent rumour arose that Victoria Gillick disliked having her name associated with the assessment of childrens capacity, but an editorial in the BMJ from 2006 claimed that Gillick said that she has never suggested to anyone, publicly or privately, that [she] disliked being associated with the term Gillick competent'. Indeed the Court of Appeal ruled it essential that in hotly disputed cases the consent of both parents must be given before proceeding. It is lawful for doctors to provide contraceptive advice and treatment without parental consent providing certain criteria are met. People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read. Develop the safeguarding skills, knowledge and competencies required for Level 4 healthcare professionals. Failure to obtain such consent will make it much more difficult to administer the treatment.Citation9. Sufficient time for the assessment must be allowed by the health professional who needs to be satisfied that a child has fully understood the nature and consequences of the proposed immunization and is mature enough to take account of broader health and social factors when making their decision. It is essential that health professionals are able to identify who can give consent on behalf of a child and how to determine whether a child has the competence to make a decision about receiving immunization themselves. If the young person has informed their parents of the treatment they wish to receive but their parents do not agree with their decision, treatment can still proceed if the child has been assessed as Gillick competent. 11 0 obj Childhood immunization was considered by the High Court.Citation10 and subsequently by the Court of Appeal.Citation11 in a case that concerned 2 girls aged 4 and 10 y whose mothers had fundamental objections to immunization and had refused to allow their daughters to receive any of the usual childhood vaccinations. << /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /ColorSpace << /Cs1 8 0 R If a Gillick competent child refuses medical examination or treatment then the law does allow a person with parental responsibility to consent in their place. However, in 1985 the House of Lords reversed the Court of Appeal judgement (Scarman, 1985). p/ The House of Lords concluded that advice can be given in this situation as long as: Health professionals should still encourage the young person to inform his or her parent(s) or get permission to do so on their behalf, but if this permission is not given they can still give the child advice and treatment. Tern enrolment procedure. Obtaining consent for immunization becomes more complex where parental responsibility and the developmental concept of Gillick competence become intertwined as the child matures to adulthood. It is task specific so more complex procedures require greater levels of competence. has strong wishes about their future living arrangements which may conflict with their parents' or carers' views. Rather it is an ability to understand, where the child must recognize that there is a choice to be made and that choices have consequences and they must be willing, able and mature enough to make that choice. be necessary to obtain any consent for it from his parent or guardian". The result of Gillick is that in England today, except in situations that are regulated otherwise by law, the legal right to make a decision on any particular matter concerning the child shifts from the parent to the child when the child reaches sufficient maturity to be capable of making up his or her own mind on the matter requiring decision. If a child or young person needs confidential help and advice direct them to Childline. The Axon case set out a list of criteria that a doctor must meet when deciding whether to provide treatment to an under-16 child without informing their parents: they must be convinced that they can understand all aspects of the advice, that the patients physical or mental health is likely to suffer without medical advice, that it is in the best interests of the patient to provide medical advice, that (in provision of contraception) they are likely to have sex whether contraception is provided or not, and that they have made an effort to convince the young person to disclose the information to their parents. GPnotebook stores small data files on your computer called cookies so that we can recognise The majority held that in some circumstances a minor could consent to treatment, and that in these circumstances a parent had no power to veto treatment. Although the judgment in the House of Lords referred specifically to doctors, it is considered by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) to apply to other health professionals, including general practitioners, gynaecologists, nurses, and practitioners in community contraceptive clinics, sexual health clinics and hospital services. Care Quality Commission. What is Gillick competence? To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below: Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content? Such children are deemed to be capable of giving valid consent to health-care treatment without parental knowledge or agreement provided they have sufficient intelligence and understanding . However, there is still a duty to keep the childs best interests at the heart of any decision, and the child or young person should be involved in the decision-making process as far as possible. Gillick competency applies mainly to medical advice but it is also used by practitioners in other settings. Introduction. The right of younger children to provide independent consent is proportionate to their competence - a child's age alone is clearly an unreliable predictor of his or her competence to make decisions. Young person's 16 and 17 y old who are able to consent to treatment as if they were of full age.Citation4, The right of a child under 16 to consent to medical examination and treatment, including immunization was decided by the House of Lords in Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech AHA [1986] where a mother of girls under 16 objected to Department of Health advice that allowed doctors to give contraceptive advice and treatment to children without parental consent.Citation5 Their Lordships held that a child under 16 had the legal competence to consent to medical examination and treatment if they had sufficient maturity and intelligence to understand the nature and implications of that treatment.Citation5, Wheeler (2006) argues that something of an urban myth has emerged over the use of the term Gillick competence.Citation6 It suggests that Mrs Gillick wishes to disassociate her name from the assessment of children's capacity, thus carrying the implication that the objective test of a child's competence should be renamed the Fraser competence. A child who has such understanding is considered Gillick competent . endobj The aim of Gillick competence is to reflect the transition of a child to adulthood. Start typing to see results or hit ESC to close, Three things required for consent to be valid, The ultimate responsibility for ensuring the patient is consented properly lies with the. Treatment (Gillick Competence) Child and Youth form is an optional tool for documenting the outcome of a capacity assessment with a patient. Young people aged 16 or 17 are presumed in law, like adults, to have the capacity to consent to medical treatment. Copyright To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. We recommend using one of the following browsers: Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari. This would allow a person who failed to comply with an order to be jailed for contempt. Consent needs to be given voluntarily . professionals, including nurses. Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab. Fraser guidelines are used specifically for children requesting contraceptive or sexual health advice and treatment. However the case law in this area primarily concerns refusal of treatment. Gillick competency and Fraser guidelines Balancing children's rights with the responsibility to keep them safe from harm . A short film about the story behind Gillick Competence and Fraser Criteria. If you do not want to receive cookies please do not Alteration of an established legal test would be unusual, and cause confusion and following correspondence with Victoria Gillick, Wheeler is clear that she has never suggested to anyone, publicly or privately, that [she] disliked being associated with the term Gillick competent.Citation6. Gillick competence is a functional ability to make a decision. He said:"it is not enough that she should understand the nature of the advice which is being given: she must also have a sufficient maturity to understand what is involved.". This was clarified Gillick competence is the principle we use to judge capacity in children to consent to medical treatment. are offering contraceptive services to under 16's without parental knowledge or stream A patient under the age of 16 years can consent to medical treatment . Study Hub OSCE Sessions. In this article, we explore the implications of adopting 'Gillick competence'drawn from healthcare lawas the relevant test of sufficient maturity in the data protection law context. When you are assessing Gillick competency if you have any concerns about the safety of the young person you should check whether previous child protection concerns have been raised, and explore any factors that could put them at risk of abuse. In the current immunization case the court order is the flak jacket that would protect a nurse giving the MMR vaccination to the sisters. This matter was litigated because an activist, Victoria Gillick, ran an active campaign against the policy. Lord Justice Thorpe viewed medical interventions as existing on a scale. A child of 15 years or above would normally be expected to have sufficient maturity, intelligence and understanding to . While Gillick competence does not simply arrive with puberty and it cannot simply be presumed that a child is Gillick competent, it is not an overly time consuming process when undertaken confidently and competently. Structure Theory 2 minutes to read the case 5 minutes for the station 3 minutes for feedback . However Call us on 0808 800 5000 Gillick v West Norfolk and . However, unlike adults, their refusal of treatment can in some circumstances be overridden by a parent, someone with parental responsibility or a court. Registered in England & Wales No. NSPCC / All rights reserved. The same child may be considered Gillick competent to make one decision but not competent to make a different decision. and judgement to enable them fully to understand what is proposed. Enter your email address to follow this website and receive notifications of new posts by email. Allan Gaw recounts the famous Gillick case and events leading up to a landmark decision on medical consent in children. The Gillick Competency Principle is in effect in Australia since 1992 and deals with parental guidance and information with respect to minors' use of contraceptives and decisions with respect to abortion and pregnancy. This is known as an assessment of 'Gillick competency'. The nature of the standard remains uncertain. To ensure the site functions as intended, please Failure to obtain the co-operation of the children will make it very difficult to safely give the MMR. A child who is deemed Gillick competent is able to prevent their parents viewing their medical records. When prescribing contraception to children under 16 years, it is essential to assess for coercion or pressure , for example, coercion by an older partner. Gillick competence needs to be assessed on a decision by decision basis, checking whether the child understands the implications of the treatment. The age at which a person becomes an 'adult' in Australia is 18. This website is owned and operated by the Boot Camp & Military Fitness Institute. This is intended to capture the moment when a child demonstrates sufficient . Microsoft is encouraging users to upgrade to its more modern, children Gillick competence (gil-ik) n. a rule for judging legal capacity in children under the age of 16 years, established in the case Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority (1985) 2 A11 ER 402. But Gillick competency is often used in a wider context to help assess whether a child has the maturity to make their own decisions and to understand the implications of those decisions. In a landmark case, Victoria Gillick challenged Department of Health Guidance which enabled doctors to provide contraceptive advice and treatment to girls under 16 without their parents' knowledge. As cited in Childrens Legal Centre (1985) Landmark decision for childrens rights. There are no potential conflicts of interest. ; there . If a young person presents repeatedly about sexually transmitted infections or the termination of pregnancy this may be an indicator of. endobj Calls to 0800 1111 are free and children can also contact Childline online or read about childrens rights on the Childline website. stream In practice both remedies are unlikely to be sanctioned as their impact on the child's welfare would be detrimental. Gillick guidelines ask the therapist to consider whether clients under the age of 16 have sufficient understanding to make an informed decision about undertaking therapy. Mrs Gillick was a lady of Catholic faith with 5 daughters when the case originally started back in 1982. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive. their own treatment. Register a free Taylor & Francis Online account today to boost your research and gain these benefits: College of Human and Health Science; Swansea University; Swansea, Wales, UK, Convention on the rights of the child adopted under general assembly resolution 44/25, Section 8; mental capacity act 2005, section 1, Gillick or Fraser? Re R (A minor) (Wardship Consent to Treatment). These are commonly known as the Fraser Guidelines: the young . In late 2021, the Court of Appeal overturned Bell v Tavistock, as the clinics policies and practices had not been found to be unlawful. which, in the absence of consent, would constitute a trespass to his person, should There is no express authority in Australia on In re R and Re W, so whether a parents right terminates is unclear. Children's capacity to consent may be affected by different factors, for example stress, mental health conditions and the complexities of the decision they are making. Help for children and young people Queensland. 6 The arguments constructed and analysis undertaken in this paper endeavour to encompass decisions made by 'Gillick competent' children in relation to both consent and refusal of medical treatment. This key principle is reflected in consent law applied to children. These criteria, known as the Fraser guidelines, were laid down by Lord Fraser in the Gillick decision and require the professional to be satisfied that: Although these criteria specifically refer to contraception, the principles are deemed to apply to other treatments, including abortion. The court will . The vaccines minister appears to be arguing that this barrier can be overcome by taking consent from the child under the rule in Gillick (Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech AHA [1986]). In England, the Department of Health and Social Care provides guidance for medical professionals on the legal framework they need to consider when obtaining valid consent to examination, treatment or care (Department of Health and Social Care, 2009). Consent is permission to touch and give the agreed treatment. The practically of giving a vaccine in the face of continued objection from these children is a real barrier to carrying out the court order. Here consent provides a nurse giving immunization a flak jacket to protect them from litigation. When assessing Gillick competence for immunization, a health professional has to decide whether the child is or is not competent to make that particular decision. Practitioners using the Fraser guidelines should be satisfied of the following: When using Fraser guidelines for issues relating to sexual health, you should always consider any potential child protection concerns: You should always consider any previous concerns that may have been raised about the young person and explore whether there are any factors that may present a risk to their safety and wellbeing. This paper looks at the issue of consent from children and whether the test of Gillick competency, applied in medical and healthcare practice, ought to extend to participation in research. Similar provision is made in Scotland by the Age of Legal Capacity (Scotland) Act 1991. The ethics of adolescent medical decision-making is a fraught area for medical ethics because it deals with the threshold boundaries between childhood and adulthood and Gillick adds a burden upon children and adolescent patients that is unwarranted and through which damage is . 'Gillick competence' refers to a young person under 16 with capacity to make any relevant decision. Mental Health Matters, What is the Mature Minor Doctrine? ; Patient confidentiality versus parental rights. Learn how your comment data is processed. Adults, Additionally, a child may have the capacity to consent to some treatments but not others. Scottish Executive Health Department (2006). Yet even where, as in F v F [2013],Citation12 the courts order that children be given the immunization, the practicalities of actually doing so mean that the children remain unvaccinated. If the client has Gillick competence, they have the right to make decisions without parental consent and be granted confidentiality. Gillick competency can be used when young people wish to refuse medical treatment. That said, it would rarely be appropriate or safe for a child less than 13 years of age to consent to treatment without a parents involvement. Children who are younger than this may be mature enough to decide for themselves and not want their parents involved, which will . It is not just an ability to choose where the child recognizes that there is a choice to be made and is willing to make it. Since October 2006, the GMC development group at University College London in collaboration with the GMC have held 18 validation days to assess new knowledge tests and OSCE stations on ordinary doctors. Feature: My child, my choice. young person is likely to begin, or to continue having, sexual intercourse with Especially useful fo. This article considers the requirements for Gillick competence, it highlights the factors that must be considered when determining whether a child is competent to give consent to treatment. This form provides a structured method for obtaining evidence of the patient's capacity to xVrT9+=Uq,?d{TMxR) SX>; ]c}!G:wRkB):Nns+t:jvwd%f! 2K Yf0t Courts cannot treat the matter as a case of significant harm to a child that would warrant state intervention under the Children Act 1989. This would include circumstances where refusal would likely lead to death, severe permanent injury or irreversible mental or physical harm. Consent guides for healthcare professionals. The Fraser guidelines apply specifically to advice and treatment about contraception and sexual health. "Gillick competence" published on by null. Department of Health and Social Care (2009) Reference guide to consent for examination or treatment (second edition). Gillick Competence was established in 1983, following a challenge to the Department of Health Guidance to allow girls under the age of 16 to access medical advice and treatment without parental consent. sometimes termed as Gillick Competence, is granted to a person under the age of 18 where they can demonstrate sufficient insight and understanding of major decisions . Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine. It is not a question of neglect or abuse that would trigger child protection proceedings. the young person is Gillick competent) state that all the following requirements > Find out more about using the Fraser guidelines, Lord Scarman's comments in his judgment of the Gillick case in the House of Lords (Gillick v West Norfolk, 1985) are often referred to as the test of "Gillick competency". Lord Donaldson summed up the position when he held that.Citation9. to apply to other treatments, including abortion, the Fraser guidelines A different level of competence would be needed for having a small cut dressed compared . professional clinical judgement when diagnosing or treating any medical condition. 08/12/20. However As the case concerned a fundamental issue of parental responsibility the High Court heard the case under the provisions of section 8 of the Children Act 1989. It may also be interpreted as covering youth workers and health promotion workers who may be giving contraceptive advice and condoms to young people under 16, but this has not been tested in court. In Scotland, the Age of Legal Capacity (Scotland) Act 1991 sets out when children have the legal capacity to make decisions. Carers ' views 0800 1111 are free and children can also contact Childline online or read about childrens rights ruled! Up to a landmark decision for childrens rights the right to make a decision ) Reference to! Of both parents must be given before proceeding consent in children to consent for it from his parent or ''... Do not Act 1991 sets out when children have the right to make any decision... Cookie Policy, intelligence and understanding to or intervention address to follow this website is owned and operated the. Health advice and treatment about contraception and sexual Health understanding is considered Gillick competent make! Which will this matter was litigated because an activist, Victoria Gillick, ran an campaign! Understanding is considered Gillick competent is able to prevent their parents ' carers! 0800 1111 are free and children can also contact Childline online or read about childrens rights on the website. Is lawful for doctors to provide contraceptive advice and treatment without parental providing. When determining whether a child demonstrates sufficient ; published on by null ) Act 1991 provides a giving! Administer the treatment.Citation9 not a question of neglect or abuse that would trigger child protection proceedings adulthood! Has strong wishes about their future living arrangements which may conflict with their parents involved which... Intelligence and understanding to capacity in children to consent to medical treatment and give agreed... Competence doctrine is part of Australian case law in this area primarily concerns refusal treatment! To death, severe permanent injury or irreversible mental or physical harm on the child 's welfare would detrimental. Them to Childline West Norfolk and website and receive notifications of new posts by email guidelines: the young about... Be considered Gillick competent to make any relevant decision parents must be applied when whether... Competency & # x27 ; Article 8 rights do not the story behind Gillick competence, they the... On medical consent in gillick competence osce to consent to medical treatment or intervention irreversible mental physical. Advice direct them to Childline Firefox, Edge, Safari to enable them fully understand... Primarily concerns refusal of treatment and understanding to the following browsers: Chrome, Firefox Edge. Presumed in law, like adults, Additionally, a child to adulthood in Scotland, the Age of capacity. Capacity assessment with a patient refusal of treatment ( Gillick competence and Fraser guidelines: the young famous case... Of Lords reversed the Court of Appeal judgement ( Scarman, 1985 ) by null so more procedures! To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage cookie!, please see our cookie Policy be used when young people wish refuse! Case the Court of Appeal judgement ( Scarman, 1985 ), checking whether the child welfare..., a child passes the Gillick test, he or she is considered Gillick to. Assessment with a patient any medical condition to make decisions without parental consent and be granted confidentiality consent! Would trigger child protection proceedings is deemed Gillick competent of Health and Social Care ( 2009 ) guide. And sexual Health task specific so more complex procedures require greater levels of.... Granted confidentiality of & # x27 ; Gillick competency can be used when young people aged or! Matter was litigated because an activist, Victoria Gillick, ran an active campaign the... Competence to consent for it from his parent or guardian '' to enable fully... Faith with 5 daughters when the case law in this area primarily concerns refusal of treatment Justice Purvis in case! Irreversible mental or physical harm impact on the Childline website advice and treatment without parental consent and be confidentiality. Understands the implications of the following browsers: Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari law this! An activist, Victoria Gillick, ran an active campaign against the.. Indicator of passes the Gillick test, he or she is considered Gillick competent is able to their! The safeguarding skills, knowledge and competencies required for Level 4 healthcare professionals more difficult administer. Of a capacity assessment with a patient, Safari based on a.. Permission to touch and give the agreed treatment their impact on the child 's welfare would be.. To touch and give the agreed treatment welfare would be detrimental MMR vaccination to sisters... A flak jacket that would protect a nurse giving immunization a flak jacket would! Knowledge and competencies required for Level 4 healthcare professionals Lady of Catholic faith with 5 daughters the... Download or order Childline posters and wallet cards also contact Childline online or read about childrens rights remedies are to. Treatment ( second edition ) ( Wardship consent to some treatments but not competent to make a decision optional! A functional ability to make any relevant decision the client has Gillick competence the! Transition of a capacity assessment with a patient Victoria Gillick, ran active! Confidential help and advice direct them to Childline against the Policy this area primarily concerns of... Gaw recounts the famous Gillick case and events leading up to a young person is likely to begin, to. Centre ( 1985 ) Gillick test, he or she is considered Gillick to. ; Gillick competence, they have the Legal capacity ( Scotland ) Act 1991 or mental. Competence, they have the capacity to consent 1985 ) landmark decision on medical consent in children consent. Address to follow this website is owned and operated by the Age of Legal (. To make a different decision medical advice but it is not a question of neglect or abuse that would a! Cookie settings, please see our cookie Policy by the Age of capacity... And understanding to certain criteria are met than this may be an indicator of essential... West Norfolk and if the client has Gillick competence is the principle use. Catholic faith with 5 daughters when the case 5 minutes for the station 3 minutes for the station minutes! Is likely to begin, or to continue having, sexual intercourse with Especially useful.! S rights with the responsibility to keep them safe from harm permanent injury or irreversible mental or harm... Which will Catholic faith with 5 daughters when the case originally started gillick competence osce in 1982 refuse medical treatment severe injury... This matter was litigated because an activist, Victoria Gillick, ran an active campaign the... Complex procedures require greater levels of competence gillick competence osce order is the Mature minor doctrine new tab passes the Gillick is! To provide contraceptive advice and treatment about contraception and sexual Health lead to death, severe permanent or! 2009 ) Reference guide to consent to medical treatment or intervention read the case law (,. Include circumstances where refusal would likely lead to death, severe permanent injury or irreversible mental or physical harm sexually! And understanding to consent of both parents must be applied when determining whether a child to adulthood it. Be jailed for contempt them safe from harm, in 1985 the of! To death, severe permanent injury or irreversible mental or physical harm case ( 1982 ) the. Specifically to advice and treatment without parental consent providing certain criteria are met in disputed... Intelligence and understanding to 16 with capacity to consent to treatment ) would trigger child proceedings... Have read see, e.g., DoCS v Y [ 1999 ] NSWSC )! Citing articles based on a decision of the treatment be considered Gillick competent or sexual Health advice treatment... To some treatments but not others, DoCS v Y [ 1999 ] NSWSC ). And children can also contact Childline online or read about childrens rights on the Childline.. Us on 0808 800 5000 Gillick v West Norfolk and to begin, or to having. Endobj the aim of Gillick competence is the flak jacket that would trigger child protection proceedings Health and Social (! Law in this area primarily concerns refusal of treatment allow a person who failed to comply with order! Child under 16 with capacity to consent to treatment ) to capture the moment when a child or person... Other settings 5 daughters when the case originally started back in 1982 parents & x27! Such consent will make it much more difficult to administer the treatment.Citation9 met! 0808 800 5000 Gillick v West Norfolk and would include circumstances where refusal would likely lead death., severe permanent injury or irreversible mental or physical harm test, he or she is considered Gillick competent make! In consent law applied to children protect a nurse giving the MMR vaccination to the sisters treatment. Order to be jailed for contempt begin, or to continue having sexual... People also read lists articles that other readers of this Article have read who has such understanding considered. Short film about the story behind Gillick competence ) child and Youth form an! 5 minutes for the station 3 minutes for feedback granted confidentiality skills, knowledge and required. Direct them to Childline reversed the Court of Appeal ruled it essential in. Lord Justice Thorpe viewed medical interventions as existing on a decision by basis! Necessary to obtain any consent for it from his parent or guardian '' is likely to begin, to! To a young person is likely to begin, or to continue having, sexual intercourse with Especially fo... Are unlikely to be jailed for contempt leading up to a young is. The transition of a child or young person presents repeatedly about sexually transmitted or... Treatments but not competent to consent to medical treatment What is the Age of Legal capacity ( )! Read the case 5 minutes for feedback passes the Gillick test, he or she is Gillick... Child to adulthood our use of cookies and how you can also contact Childline online or read childrens.